Mazda MX6 Forums: MX6 Forum User Control Panel
 


» Wheel & Tire Center

» Sponsors
» Sponsors
Go Back   Mazda MX6 Forums: MX6 Forum > 1G MX6 (88-92) > 1G MX6 General > 1G MX6 Forced Induction
Register Home Forum Garage Active Topics Arcade Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 1-14-09, 4:36   #1 (permalink)
Banned
  Total: 2803 Power: 0
 
SixSick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Age: 33
iTrader: (3)
How come none of you have ever made a top mount exhaust manifold?

Besides lack of welding skill, I'm curious why not? There's plenty of room.
SixSick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 1-14-09, 4:53   #2 (permalink)
  Total: 302 Power: 3
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: perth, Australia
Age: 32
iTrader: (0)
No need for it, as you already know.

And there isn't that much room as evident by people running into hood clearance issues when fitting an external wastegate.

Besides, top mount manifolds only make sense when the chosen turbo is too large to fit down low.

VF12 - VJ11 hybrid http://www.mx6.com/forums/1g-mx6-for...ic-inside.html 5 1/4" VDO splits in custom door trims http://www.mx6.com/forums/1g-mx6-gen...cs-inside.html, 12" sub in custom boot/trunk http://www.mx6.com/forums/1g-mx6-gen...cs-inside.html, 2.5" cat back, 18"x12"x3" FMIC.
mx_masta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 7:55   #3 (permalink)
  Total: 460 Power: 5
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: , Close to Niagara Falls CA
Age: 31
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SixSick6 View Post
Besides lack of welding skill, I'm curious why not? There's plenty of room.
I'd thought of that before, but thought if i'm gonna do that, why not just do a ram horn style, and run it down.....
Theres lots of room to run it down, and less chance of burning the hood, haveing the turbo even closer to the hood.
I've seen it happen before, and I wouldn't be willing to ruin a tri-stage paint job, due to stupidity.

Team DISPLACEMENT REPLACEMENT
1993 B2200 F2T SDS t3t4 "beater".
1993 B2200 Stock, mint, waiting for more power.
1989 MX6 Turbo It will be alive again next year, and runnin 12's
SXE MX6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 11:02   #4 (permalink)
  Total: 22 Power: 2
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Milton, PA, USA
iTrader: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mx_masta View Post
Besides, top mount manifolds only make sense when the chosen turbo is too large to fit down low.
i agree.. and it looks kool..

But what would i gain from doing this other than a melted hood.. with the stock turbo or the gt28r that i am going to be running.

89 Ford Probe GT28r
Never Scared to Be Different.
90probef2t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 11:37   #5 (permalink)
MX6.com Supporter - Click Here for Information
World's 1st 4WS Probe
  Total: 149 Power: 3
 
d0zxmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: , NC, USA
Age: 22
iTrader: (4)
You would be working agianst gravity.

d0zxmustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 12:44   #6 (permalink)
  Total: 1075 Power: 5
 
zlyricist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: lakewood, CO, USA
Age: 25
iTrader: (8)
Quote:
Originally Posted by d0zxmustang View Post
You would be working agianst gravity.
lol

im pretty sure most think the stock manifold is well designed....... and can probably handle all the f2 can throw at it. even large turbo's fit if you just use a smaller cooilng fan. so why do more work than you need to?

besides, welding on a t3/ihi/mitsu flange is cheap and easy, just like most f2 owners

1991 MX6 GT - my slut
95 LS SOLD - 96 M edition SOLD - 93 KLZE new daily
zlyricist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 12:46   #7 (permalink)
MX6.com Supporter - Click Here for Information
GD 2.2 i Turbo
  Total: 234 Power: 3
 
Keeloh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles {213}
iTrader: (44)
I aint cheap with my car


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefsp0t View Post
[fizzle] what other people think.
Keeloh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 12:48   #8 (permalink)
  Total: 1075 Power: 5
 
zlyricist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: lakewood, CO, USA
Age: 25
iTrader: (8)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keeloh View Post
I aint cheap with my car
hey ill spend good money where it is needed. you just have to make sure if you are cheap, to cheap out on the right things

1991 MX6 GT - my slut
95 LS SOLD - 96 M edition SOLD - 93 KLZE new daily
zlyricist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 12:52   #9 (permalink)
MX6.com Supporter - Click Here for Information
GD 2.2 i Turbo
  Total: 234 Power: 3
 
Keeloh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles {213}
iTrader: (44)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefsp0t View Post
[fizzle] what other people think.
Keeloh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 13:50   #10 (permalink)
MX6.com Supporter - Click Here for Information
  Total: 467 Power: 4
 
chief tool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Age: 37
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SixSick6 View Post
Besides lack of welding skill, I'm curious why not? There's plenty of room.
I dont like to advertise whats in the engine bay! I prefer the turbo to be out of sight

Plus I have seen people running high mounts burn the paint of the bonnet (hood) but I am sure there are probably solutions for that....

84 626 sedan FE SOHC turbo (sleeper) soon to be DOHC
89 626 5 door F2T now with VF34
90 323 sedan B6 SOHC Slug-o-matic DD, sold...too slow
chief tool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 15:29   #11 (permalink)
  Total: 519 Power: 3
 
compnut21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
iTrader: (10)
i've always wondered why people don't put the turbo backwards and the the exhaust coming down on the non a/c side. would also make more sense for people with a large fmic.

compnut21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 15:33   #12 (permalink)
Banned
  Total: 2803 Power: 0
 
SixSick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Age: 33
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by d0zxmustang
You would be working agianst gravity.
No you wouldn't, it would be the same thing!

The stock turbo (or any turbo for that matter on the stock exhaust manifold) or any exhaust manifold has the turbo hanging off the ex man with little or no support underneath. It's heavy, and those 6 studs don't do a whole lot in an aluminum head.

With a top mount- I'm talking a U shaped (use your head dummies) exhaust manifold in which case you could locate the turbo anywhere you want for height and have zero issues with the hood. Proper oil drainage is about it. You could anchor it to much more including the block and it would be much more stable. One thing you would have to worry about is how you anchor it and be thoughtful of it being too rigid and breakign welds. Other than that you'd be golden.



Make your primaries as long or as short as needed and compensate for possible lag using smaller diameter piping. If done correctly with some thought this can used with our 12v sohc stump puller and not have ridiculous lag.

As for burned hoods- as said you could locate the turbo as high or low as you need to and if you really wanted to you could buy a heat shield for the exhaust side that is available anywhere and especiial eBay on the cheap. No burned hoods even if you have a huge GT40 like many many mnay mnay mnay properly built Hondas with sick paint jobs to boot.



Come on guys use your heads ^ You can do anything you want if you put some thought into it!

The problem here is being stuck in a box and never travelling elsewhere. With a top mount you'd have so many more advantages for pretty much everything. Hell you (WE) could even do a side mount like plenty of S2000 turbos ex mans are ran every day.



You really can do anything you want as long as you take into account bends and angles, keep things smooth and fluid and travelling well, move only what is necessary, change things around that are much wiser elsewhere, have fun, and do what you want:



Again, see "box".

Last edited by SixSick6 : 1-14-09 at 15:49.
SixSick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 16:37   #13 (permalink)
  Total: 950 Power: 5
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: canada
Age: 35
iTrader: (0)
I think the engine bay heat might be increased running a top mounted turbo and the exhaust would be even longer then it is, many cars have the turbo between the block and fire wall. I guess it keeps the intake manifold cooler having it in in the air flow behind the rad, also there exhausts are shorter (flow better), but there is allot more engine heat, so I guess top mount wouldn't matter on our cars, Except they are not Dohc which means our plugs and wires aren't in the middle of the head, How would our pug wires do with a turbo right next to them (some sort of heat shielding would definitely be required). Then the coolant and oil return lines will have to be run/extended around to manifold to reach the fittings bellow the manifold, this would probably require using braided lines instead of the rubber ones you can use when mounting the upgraded turbo bellow the manifold.

The F2T block is better set up to run the turbo under the manifold then above.

When the guy with the shop next door gave me a CT26 (the hot side housing on the CT26 is huge and for no reason) for a brief minute I though of cutting a stock manifold at the flanges, flipping the manifold over and welding it back to the flanges, then cutting a whole in a hood and installing a Subaru hood scoop to house the giant ugly turbo (NOT ON ANY OF MY CARS, OF COURSE!). But then I did a bit of reading up on the CT26 and came to my senses (Sorry Larken).

-------------------------------------------------------------------

A better question would be why do those running stand alone, larger turbo's, custom manifolds .... not flip the turbo around ? -Intake on passenger side, this would make plumbing a front mount intercooler much easier and more efficient. This also makes fitting larger turbo's with internal waste gates easier (With cooling fan modification).

Even those running a Vaf (me included) can untape the wire harness at the Vaf plug wires and along the fire wall, tape up the harness without those wires, and then run the Vaf wires and plug to the front passenger side.

http://www.cardomain.com/id/mazdacarnage
BUILD IT, BEAT IT, BREAK IT, REBUILD IT, BEAT IT MORE, BREAK IT AGAIN, BUILD IT BETTER, BEAT IT THE MOST AND ?
Mazda Carnage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 16:47   #14 (permalink)
  Total: 302 Power: 3
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: perth, Australia
Age: 32
iTrader: (0)
The point that a lot us are making is that with the F2T there is no need for any of what you just posted.

With cars such as HONDAs' which are not factory turbocharged a manifold must be made, bought or modified to fit a turbo.
And when forced to make changes people will come up with many different solutions.
Eg, side mount, top mount, rear mount (HA)

The F2T already has a well made (not perfect though) manifold that will probably never crack.
And can be modified to suit many different turbo's.
The only compromise of any real concern on the F2T turbo system that I can see is the oil return line.
Which with a large turbo can be dealt with by dumping the return back into the sump instead.

Basically the stock F2T manifold has it won over fancy stainless steel or cast elbow manifolds.
In function, durability & cost. The only thing it really lacks in is looks.

VF12 - VJ11 hybrid http://www.mx6.com/forums/1g-mx6-for...ic-inside.html 5 1/4" VDO splits in custom door trims http://www.mx6.com/forums/1g-mx6-gen...cs-inside.html, 12" sub in custom boot/trunk http://www.mx6.com/forums/1g-mx6-gen...cs-inside.html, 2.5" cat back, 18"x12"x3" FMIC.
mx_masta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1-14-09, 16:49   #15 (permalink)
SD6
  Total: 729 Power: 5
 
SD6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Age: 26
iTrader: (2)
These are all things I've thought about doing, but never got around to, mostly because of CA smog regulations.

But, those days are over now. Once the SDGC concludes we can do pretty much whatever we want with the F2T and not have to worry about it.

98 GS-T Spyder

SD6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Permissions
New Threads
Post Replies
Post Attachments
Edit Your Posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:43.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
© Copyright 2000-2009, MX6.com
MX6.com is in no way affiliated to Mazda Motor Corp.
All views expressed in this site are the personal opinion of the author and not necessarily the owners of MX6.com.