Quote:
Originally Posted by rodhog
That is the truth right there.
|
It isn't! Back up your BULLSHlT with numbers buddy.
Off the top of my head :
MS1 = 12x12 with movable bins
MS2 = 12x12 or 16x16 with movable bins
MS2 = 2/3us fuel resolution
MS2 base = 2/3us spark resolution
MS2 extra = 10us spark resolution
MS1 low res = 100us fuel resolution, no idea about spark
MS1 high res = better than ms1 low res fuel resolution, but not close to as good as ms2 fuel resolution.
MS2 = 30 IO pins
MS1 = 35 IO pins
MS1/MS2 = launch control, flat shift, boost control, etc etc etc etc etc.
MS1/MS2 = COP up to 6 cyilnders, and peak and hold injectors up to v8
LEMG3 - Specifications — Link Engine Management Systems - plug-in & wire-in aftermarket ECU's
Link = ignition 0.1 degree "control" is this resolution? not sure. but res <= control
Link = 10us fuel "control"
Link = about 40 IO pins (26 pin header??? (ms has 37))
Link = all the same features as ms and some more.
Link = 22x20 tables
etc.
The question then becomes better at what? Better at running an engine accurately? If that is the question, don't argue with me. MS2 = top notch.
If the question is support/features/blah blah blah, sure, maybe ms2 falls a bit short in some areas, but considering it is 1/3 - 1/20 the price you'd expect that...
Stop talking crap...
Fred.