View Single Post
Old 5-16-08, 5:53   #12 (permalink)
egonn
New Member
  Total: 32 Power: 1
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location:
Age: 28
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by M2cupcar View Post
If the OE clutch/pp/flywheel assembly doesn't get the disk on the splines sufficiently, then the face of the bell will be milled in hopes that it will do the job. Of course everything you remove from the bell is going to also reduce its strength. I don't think 10mm would be an issue, hoping it won't take that much. But until I get everything in place I won't know. Still have a turbo to install first.

Oh.. that sounds good..

turbo?.. didn't you already had one installed?.. or is it an upgrade perhaps?


I've been thinking of my ITB's.

I have an idea to make variable length runners. Telescope-modell that is adjusted by a stepperengine or some other electrical servo. In its part cotrolled by the ecu and according to a predefined curve in relation to the rev.

This curve i thought i would "scientifically" get by measuring the AFR of different lengths with at logger and through the rev-registry. When i've gotten 5-10 lengths logged i can then put them in a diagram and will get my curve.

The basehypothesis in this is that whenever the pulses harmonize you will get a "boost" of air into the combustion chamber and that will show in the AFR.

It's also important that you don't have any autoadjust/closed loop-stuff activated so it won't mess with your logg-data.



The goal is to broaden the torque-curve so that you can get the best out of both worlds.. with long runners during low rpms and shorter runners the farther up your rpms you go.. I have thought of this since i realized that i lost some of my awesome low-end torque comparing ITB's with modified "stock"-intake.
egonn is offline   Reply With Quote