[ls six]

Second of all, for every gallon of ethanol yeilded, it takes between 7-11 gallons of diesel. Its not renewable.

Don't know where your getting those #'s but if that's all transportation costs then gasoline and diesel costs just as much to transport.

Its not in any way better. Its more expensive and less widely available.

Yes because it's a new fuel as far a mass consumption is concerned.

And really, if it is taking up to 50% of the corn grown in some states

,

It isn't though. Read up.

then it will affect corn and corn based products' costs.

It's the price of gas and diesel that's jacking up the price of corn and corn products. Transportation costs are one of the bigest expenses in the food industry.

Do some research before you come in here with a dick in your mouth trying to talk about something you know nothing about.

I have, you on the other hand have made only baseless assumptions and lies.

{EDIT} Heres some facts.....

Depending on composition and source, E85 has an octane rating of 100 - 105 compared to regular gasoline's typical rating of 87 - 93. This allows it to be used in higher compression engines which tend to produce more power per unit of displacement than their gasoline counterparts. Since the reciprocating mass of the engine increases in proportion to the displacement of the engine E85 has a higher potential efficiency for an engine of equal power. One complication is that use of gasoline in an engine with a high enough compression ratio to use E85 efficiently would likely result in catastrophic failure due to engine detonation, as the octane rating of gasoline is not high enough to withstand the greater compression ratios in use in an engine specifically designed to run on E85. Use of E85 in an engine designed specifically for gasoline would result in a loss of the potential efficiency that it is possible to gain with this fuel. Using E85 in a gasoline engine has the drawback of achieving lower fuel economy as more fuel is needed per unit air (stoichiometric fuel ratio) to run the engine in comparison with gasoline. E85 also has a lower heating value (units of energy per unit mass) than gasoline leading to a reduction in power output in a gasoline engine. E85 consumes more fuel in flex fuel type vehicles when the vehicle uses the same fuel/air mixture and compression for both E85 and gasoline because of its lower stoichiometric fuel ratio and lower heating value. European car maker Saab currently produces a flex fuel version of their 9-5 sedan which consumes the same amount of fuel whether running e85 or gasoline, though it is not available in the United States. So in order to save money at the pump with current flex fuel vehicles available in the United States the price of E85 must be much lower than gasoline. Currently E85 is about 5-10% less expensive in most areas. More than 20 fueling stations across the Midwest are selling E85 25%-40% cheaper than gasoline. E85 also gets less MPG, at least in flex fuel vehicles. In one test, a Chevy Tahoe flex-fuel vehicle averaged 18 MPG [U.S. gallons] for gasoline, and 13 MPG for E85, or 28% fewer MPG than gasoline. In that test, the cost of gas averaged $3.42, while the cost for E85 averaged $3.09, or 90% the cost of gasoline.