View Single Post
Old 6-28-08, 20:36   #16 (permalink)
YouAsk
  Total: 111 Power: 5
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Age: 27
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fe3t b2200 View Post
no way is the 4g63 head better! for [fizzle] sake it has rocker arms making agressive cam profiles a real task and the exhaust ports are poorly shaped
fe3 far superior
they are better. The valvetrain in FE3 heads sucks bigass stock. Can't even rev to stock revlimit on most heads (7300rpm), even that it's a dual-spring design

4g63 heads are better with a much ligher valvetrain and it's no problem to rev 8500-9000 with stock single springs in my evo1 head
I use a pair of 280 cams with somewhere aroung 11mm lift. No problems with stock HLA's and rocker arms.


How much would you say a stock FE3 head can take without porting it?



I like the FE3 much and a FE3 bottom end with 4g63 head would be nice

Mazda 626 FE-doch -88
Mitsu TD054-16G turbo, 1000cc injectors, 255lph WALBRO fuelpump, modified fuelrail, about 8.6:1 pistons.. EVO IC. Megasquirt controlling the fuel

Mitsubishi Lancer EVOLUTION 4x4 -93
YouAsk is offline