![]() |
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) |
![]() |
you mean high boost and blocked off covers? ;-)
there are good ways and bad ways to achieve this, all the good ways create suction in the crank case. the bad ways are just open, the stupid seal their systems, or only vent them behind the throttle where on boost its closed and needs boost psi in the engine to vent anything... most of those at a quick glance of the first page looked to be just open types. thats not ideal for oil life or power, but is fine for seals that would be pushed open by boost or blowby otherwise. i always like it when you post in my threads :-) dunno why. perhaps because you have a clue ;-) fred. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Quote:
As for the Honda guys...well, ill admit I look over the fence and shake my head at times. but...there are so many of them and they have been doing this so long. You never know where a good idea will come from. Gavin(semi-clueless) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Ok, i was linked to this thread on miataturbo.net yesterday, and had a couple of longish chats with Rob and Brian (m2cupcar and neogenesis2004) about it. after that i had a think and stare at some pictures and came up with the following comment that i've pasted here for completeness :
Quote:
currently that seems to me to be optimum. if the vent gas can be kept clean enough, then feeding it to the turbo is just fine. if it cant, a can with filter would be better so the intercooler stays dry. fred. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) |
![]() |
just had a read through that honda thread that gavin linked again.
it would probably be beneficial to fit a drain hole to the sump when doing your turbo oil return to allow catch cans somewhere to let the oil go back in. i used to run mine to the dipstick hole, but thats no go for me now with the manifold where it is. i'd like an oil temperature guage anyway, and the sump is good place to do that, so i will probably end up drilling mine under pressure and welding it on the car anyway. i can do some extra drains at the same time. some of the stuff in that thread is ridiculous though. four big hoses off the top cover and two big hoses off the block and a small drain to the sump and a pcv to the manifold. LOL. just run it without the cover man, it would be a lot easier :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) |
![]() |
Coming in far too late to make any sense but here it goes :P
Are we talking about that exit from the valve cover that used to return to the intake on stock motors? I ripped that pipe off and put a little breather filter there only. Now as time has moved on and I've read a bit more: 1.) was this wise? the intake vacuum would have normalised pressure to an extent, now that it is just the filter, what is really happening in there. 2.) Did I completely misunderstand this thread hehe? If so I am sorry ;P |
|
Stock 2.0 16v FE DOHC in a Mazda 323 4dr, Dicktator ECU.
http://www.sl-tuning.co.za ![]() " You don't buy a big boring car, you lease it " - STW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 (permalink) |
![]() |
so, in your fwd application, looking at the engine bay, you have a filter on the right hand side of the valve cover above the gearbox?
what do you have from the other port? short hose and pcv to the plenum? if so, that is fine. at idle the engine sucks gas from the case and swallows it, and draws it in through your filter, under load, excess gas exits through your filter. with much more power, the basic principle remains the same, just the "under load" part needs to flow a lot more than stock to avoid pressure and leakage and lost power. fred. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 (permalink) |
![]() |
Ta Fred, Dude not sure what I am smoking, this is my setup, so equalization of pressure still occurs correctly.
![]() I don't know why I had confused my setup as (1) having the breather and (2) having the piping. |
|
Stock 2.0 16v FE DOHC in a Mazda 323 4dr, Dicktator ECU.
http://www.sl-tuning.co.za ![]() " You don't buy a big boring car, you lease it " - STW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) |
![]() |
M2CupCar did some good work yesterday!
He was having a few issues with leakage and boost, and upon discussion did a temporary setup for his pcv where he rerouted the in to the out and vice versa including moving the valve over. Apparently this helped quite a bit (not too surprising really. Heres the temp setup : ![]() Further to that he pulled the fitting on the end out, and found the hole inside to be really small. so he replaced it with a large fitting. he also bored a hold in the back of the other bank. Here are the results : Small hole (quiet in the cheap seats) : ![]() New hole in the other bank : ![]() Ready to go (mint!) : ![]() Cheers Rob! Fred. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 (permalink) |
![]() |
Need to clean up the leftover silicon sealer from the OE chamber install and modify the exhaust chamber (I'm going to shorten it and flip up the leading edge with a drop off in the rear to dump oil), then reinstall it and the pcv chamber plate. Then I'll need to fab up a catch and find some big hoses. Those are 3/8" npt pipe nipples - that's the max size you'll get in those spaces. Step drill bit is mandatory for a good clean hole. Extra care is needed when overboring the OE exhaust side vent hole to keep from breaking through the top.
Seeing the size of the OE breather passage "L", explains why swapping that port with the OE pcv port showed improved vent under boost. Though the tube I used at the pcv port was small it was still 50% larger than the OE "L" tube. |
|
| 1990 Mx-5 | Silver Red LE interior | FE DOHC | T3/T04e 57trim/.50AR Stage3/.48AR | FM 1.6 LINK ECU with PLink & Palm M500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 (permalink) |
![]() |
Ok - modded and install the intake side vent plate. It's using one cast chamber fin on the cam cover and one chamber fin that's tack welded on the plate itself, plus the fin(s) I added on the end. The stock drain hole is at the rear near the port exit as stock in the bottom of the well.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| 1990 Mx-5 | Silver Red LE interior | FE DOHC | T3/T04e 57trim/.50AR Stage3/.48AR | FM 1.6 LINK ECU with PLink & Palm M500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 (permalink) |
![]() |
I got the Kia cam cover installed as modded. Both lines run to my catch can with the vent filter on it. It appears to have resolved the cc pressure issues at high boost. I no longer see the weeping oil from around the cam cover gasket. I'm not getting much oil in the can either. But I can say that the can should be packed with something to help "grab" the oil vapor. My can is empty and after lots of hard boosting you can see some vapor escaping from the filter. And under the right conditions (top down, stopped at a traffic light) you can smell it. I think adding the substrate/packing to the can and running the filter back to the intake pre turbo would probably solve those issues.
![]() ![]() |
|
| 1990 Mx-5 | Silver Red LE interior | FE DOHC | T3/T04e 57trim/.50AR Stage3/.48AR | FM 1.6 LINK ECU with PLink & Palm M500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 (permalink) |
![]() |
I've written an article on crank case ventilation here :
DIYEFI.org Forum - View topic - Crank Case Ventilation Please be as critical as you can be, I'm interested to see the information and formatting etc be as good as possible. I hope it helps people in the future :-) Fred. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 (permalink) |
|
i have a question (probably cause im brain dead from work and missed the answer)
in this setup ![]() why bother with the catch can at all? keep oil from dripping around the engine bay or emissions were my only guesses. also is there a better brand/type of pcv valve that can be used? maybe one that seals well under boost or something of the like? and last but not least... you talked about the venturi effect using flowing exhaust air to create vacuum... but why not incorporate something in the intake tract to create vacuum no matter what condition? i'm probably just not thinking clearly though, but please do criticize. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|