![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
![]() |
f2t pistons in fe3
im building a fe3 turbo for my 1979 626 hardtop coupe and was wondering why nobody ( al least that i know of ) uses the f2t pistons in the fe3? the only difference is the way the pin in the piston is locked. on the fe3 its done with clamps and the f2t the pin is locked in the connectong rod. im planning on using the f2t piston on the fe3 rods and crank and blok the piston pin whith teflon caps on the end. this way i have a cheap and efective compression lowering piston.
any suggestions? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
![]() |
i didnt realise that the deck height and pin size was the same?
i know the valve reliefs arent perfect, but, they are probably close enough. might wanna use the NA ones though, as the turbo ones might make the compression too low. chamber volume is different... interesting if no one noticed before. fred. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
![]() |
yeah the pins and the deck height are the same. i can make a photo if someones interested.
do the na pistons have a little hole to??? i was planning on using the turbo ones and shave the fe3 deck a bit to create a squish of 0,7mm. havent had the time to mesure the volumes and calculate the compression ratio though. ill try to get some na pistons to! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Are you sure about that? Fraud and I and Fred were discussing that a few months ago. I'm trying to find the exact thread:
http://www.mx6.com/forums/fe-dohc/18...ml#post1813753 (did you know...) http://www.mx6.com/forums/fe-dohc/34...ml#post1788205 (Fe3 Head?) Last edited by SixSick6 : 7-29-07 at 12:40. |
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
![]() |
100% sure about the pin size and the deck height.
didn't calculate the compression ratio yet. the only difference is that the f2t piston pin is pressed or sqeezed ( dunno the correct word) on the connecting rod and the fe3 is full floating and locked with two springs on each side. so if youd wanna put f2 pistons on a fe3 rod youd have to make teflon ( i use akulon) caps the slide in the side of the piston pin to keep it from scratching the cilinder. i never done this before but it seems alotta drag racers and race car builders do it to so i'll try it. ill post a pic tomorrow! ( if i dont forget ) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Quote:
i had the fe3 and the f2t piston shoved on the same pin and the deck was excactly equal. so if you put it on the fe3 rod and crank you'll be OK. if you put in a f2t crank you for sure end up whith the pistons far above the fe3 deck. the engine block of the fe3 is also lower as the f2t. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
FE3N vs F2
Actually i was thinking the same thing, i have at this moment a FE3 piston and a n/a F2 piston side by side, everything is exactly the same, deck height, skirt ,ring grooves etc. i have never seen a FT2 piston,but this one has a large dish.it would make an excellent piston for a turbo FE3. i have found a difference in id of the pins, which would be a better choice, the two id's of the FE3 pins i have are13mm and 14mm??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
![]() |
so by id you mean internal diameter?
ifso i would take the 13mm. but i doubt a 14mm would brake. i never took a close look to the f2 na piston but the f2t also has a big dish in it. i guess its bout the same as the na dish only deeper. they also sell cupper gaskets for the fe3 that are bout 1.6mm thick. so when your piston is 4mm above deck that makes 4-1,6(gasket)-0,7(squish) = 1,7 mm. so if you'd shave 1,7mm of the stock f2 ( na or turbo) you have a perfect squish. and by estimation i think the f2t piston would make a excellent piston for a stroked fe3 turbo this way. of course the volume of the fe3 head is slighly more than the f2t head ( 4valves compared to 3) but shaving 1,7mm of the piston edges would make up for that. my engines are @ the shop i work. ill do some messuring tomorrow! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|