Just a few for now "2.2l DOHC stroker"

**lundgren420** · 11-10-07, 16:36

These are some pictures from the original teardown.

By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28

By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28

So I picked up my short block from the machinest and thought i would post a few pics for today and will post more on Monday.

By lundgren420000, shot with HP Photosmart E427 at 2007-11-10

By lundgren420000, shot with HP Photosmart E427 at 2007-11-10

By lundgren420000, shot with HP Photosmart E427 at 2007-11-10
fell free to drool now.

**Dutch** · 11-10-07, 16:37

wow... i think im yealous...
good going there

**lundgren420** · 11-10-07, 16:38

thanks man i cant wait to hear it run

RobbieRat · 11-10-07, 17:19

Nice mate, i know just how you feel

**fredio54** · 11-10-07, 18:42

sweet :-) looking good!

**eraezer** · 11-10-07, 20:48

sweet indeed :P

**RbluEMx6** · 11-11-07, 14:38

Very nice!

**STW** · 11-12-07, 2:22

Good stuff! Always nice to see a 2.2 DOHC

**NSXR** · 11-12-07, 8:06

Hey Man,

Great to see that the project is going good.
So it is gonna be a 2.2 Turbo DOHC right?

Question:
Do you still have the parts from the F8-DOHC?
Pistons , crankshaft etc ...

I think I might need that soon.

Peace
NSXR

**lundgren420** · 11-12-07, 10:36

here is something else to chew on

By lundgren420000 at 2007-11-12

**lundgren420** · 11-12-07, 10:44

this is the factory d16A6 piston and rod vs factory f8-dohc piston and rod
the diffrence in displacement is .2L and the honda engine is rated at 112hp and the f8 is 115 so why are the rods soooooooo mutch thickre and stronger because in the effort to increase their fuel economey by reducing the rotating mass weight they made a really weak bottom end. My reason behind my saying HONDAs SUCK.

By lundgren420000, shot with HP Photosmart E427 at 2007-11-12

**fredio54** · 11-12-07, 10:51

honda doesnt suck, the d engines are transport solutions and nothing more. mazda chose back then to over engineer its machines. honda were just ahead of the game.

dont confuse a bunch of idiots driving around rice in an arrogant manor with the car company being crap. because its not.

in essence, a manufacturer that provides you with significant margins for heavy mods (strong drivetrains, big rods, large journals etc) has failed in its first intent to do well in the market it was trying to compete in.

pencil rods are a good thing at high rpm with NA loads.

**lundgren420** · 11-12-07, 11:28

i have just seen a lot of snaped honda rods in the past and figured it was a solution to fuel eficency but "kids" with rice on the brain dont think to build an engine for performance instead of using one that just revs to 8500. So i have a problem with the HONDA "kids" not the company its self. Thanks for putting me in my place Fred.

**fredio54** · 11-12-07, 11:45

sorry man :-)

i have a strong dislike with a lot of honda kids too, and we dont even have that many in nz. there is a definite arrogance from certain car groups with regards their cars being way better than all others. i dont like it from any of them. i like nissans, hondas (well, their engines, and the s2k anyway) toyotas, mazdas, and aircooled vws. i'd be partial to other stuff too if it wasnt for various things that make them unaccepatble to me, like excessive cost to performance ratio etc.

you could say that mazda kids dont think too much about their engines often either.

you couldnt count on your fingers and toes the f2ts that have been killed on this site with the "turn up the boost bro, it'll be sweet" mentality. rods didnt fail, but headgaskets and pistons frequently did.

anyway, sorry for being a bit blunt with it.

glad you took it well!

fred.

defiler · 11-12-07, 13:59

Quote:

he diffrence in displacement is .2L and the honda engine is rated at 112hp and the f8 is 115

.... so what are each rated for torque output?

11-10-07, 16:36	#1 (permalink)
lundgren420 Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: OZARK, MO, USA Age: 25 iTrader: (8)	Even more great pics "2.2l DOHC stroker" These are some pictures from the original teardown. By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 By lundgren420000 at 2008-07-28 So I picked up my short block from the machinest and thought i would post a few pics for today and will post more on Monday. By lundgren420000, shot with HP Photosmart E427 at 2007-11-10 By lundgren420000, shot with HP Photosmart E427 at 2007-11-10 By lundgren420000, shot with HP Photosmart E427 at 2007-11-10 fell free to drool now. Last edited by lundgren420 : 7-29-08 at 2:48. Reason: got rid of a crapy pick
	1988 MX6 N/A M/T -getting a new heart. Check it out http://www.mx6.com/forums/showthread...ferrerid=35300 1989 Probe GT M/T -my new toy 1980 Monte Carlo W/305 H.O.-my first ride and iv'e still got her

11-10-07, 16:38	#3 (permalink)
lundgren420 Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: OZARK, MO, USA Age: 25 iTrader: (8)	thanks man i cant wait to hear it run
	1988 MX6 N/A M/T -getting a new heart. Check it out http://www.mx6.com/forums/showthread...ferrerid=35300 1989 Probe GT M/T -my new toy 1980 Monte Carlo W/305 H.O.-my first ride and iv'e still got her

11-10-07, 18:42	#5 (permalink)
fredio54 Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Auckland, New Zealand iTrader: (1)	sweet :-) looking good!
	DIYEFI.org - TRUE DIY engine management Mazda FE3/FE-DOHC Master Index Thread (work in progress) Mazda truck with FE-DOHC/FE3 "BIG like your house" Holset Turbo drinking 2.2 litres of fuel per minute ~= 385hp crank RIP SleepCounter :-( we will miss you! - RIP fredio54 :-( will we miss you?

11-10-07, 20:48	#6 (permalink)
eraezer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: , Sweden Age: 23 iTrader: (0)	sweet indeed :P
	-:\|my GC\|:- Mazda 626 lx coupe 1984, 2l FE carb., 99% rustfree, Waiting on shelf: Custom Koni's + Koni springs -:\|my GD\|:- Mazda 626 glx hatchback 1990, FE-DOHC, Dutch FSTbar, MS2 PCB v3.0, Innovate LC-1, Mitsubishi TD04-15T @ 0.55bar. Soon TD05H-16G + new manifold

11-11-07, 14:38	#7 (permalink)
RbluEMx6 Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: San Antonio, TX, USA Age: 23 iTrader: (0)	Very nice!
	-Rick- 88 MX6 GT Celeste <--Cardomain Page Updated 7-8-08 Boosted on an Electromotive TECII standalone. FE-DOHC rebuild 265hp, 290ft/tq @ 15psi '08 FORD Ranger Sport

11-10-07, 17:19	#4 (permalink)
RobbieRat Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: , Melbourne Age: 43 iTrader: (0)	Nice mate, i know just how you feel

11-12-07, 2:22	#8 (permalink)
STW Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Turku, Finland Age: 32 iTrader: (0)	Good stuff! Always nice to see a 2.2 DOHC
	626 '88 Wagon, turbo 2.0 DOHC My vBGarage My ride at CarDomain

11-12-07, 8:06	#9 (permalink)
NSXR Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Toulon, France Age: 30 iTrader: (0)	Hey Man, Great to see that the project is going good. So it is gonna be a 2.2 Turbo DOHC right? Question: Do you still have the parts from the F8-DOHC? Pistons , crankshaft etc ... I think I might need that soon. Peace NSXR
	Car #1: '91 626 2.2i 12V TURBO 4WD Hatch (Blown tranny )... Car #2: '91 626 2.0i 16V 4WS Cpe (Blown Headgasket) New MAZDA 626 4WD Coming home Soon

11-12-07, 10:36	#10 (permalink)
lundgren420 Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: OZARK, MO, USA Age: 25 iTrader: (8)	here is something else to chew on By lundgren420000 at 2007-11-12
	1988 MX6 N/A M/T -getting a new heart. Check it out http://www.mx6.com/forums/showthread...ferrerid=35300 1989 Probe GT M/T -my new toy 1980 Monte Carlo W/305 H.O.-my first ride and iv'e still got her

11-12-07, 10:44	#11 (permalink)
lundgren420 Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: OZARK, MO, USA Age: 25 iTrader: (8)	you will find this funny this is the factory d16A6 piston and rod vs factory f8-dohc piston and rod the diffrence in displacement is .2L and the honda engine is rated at 112hp and the f8 is 115 so why are the rods soooooooo mutch thickre and stronger because in the effort to increase their fuel economey by reducing the rotating mass weight they made a really weak bottom end. My reason behind my saying HONDAs SUCK. By lundgren420000, shot with HP Photosmart E427 at 2007-11-12 By lundgren420000, shot with HP Photosmart E427 at 2007-11-12 By lundgren420000, shot with HP Photosmart E427 at 2007-11-12 By lundgren420000, shot with HP Photosmart E427 at 2007-11-12 Last edited by lundgren420 : 11-12-07 at 14:22. Reason: wrong engine code for honda
	1988 MX6 N/A M/T -getting a new heart. Check it out http://www.mx6.com/forums/showthread...ferrerid=35300 1989 Probe GT M/T -my new toy 1980 Monte Carlo W/305 H.O.-my first ride and iv'e still got her

11-12-07, 10:51	#12 (permalink)
fredio54 Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Auckland, New Zealand iTrader: (1)	honda doesnt suck, the d engines are transport solutions and nothing more. mazda chose back then to over engineer its machines. honda were just ahead of the game. dont confuse a bunch of idiots driving around rice in an arrogant manor with the car company being crap. because its not. in essence, a manufacturer that provides you with significant margins for heavy mods (strong drivetrains, big rods, large journals etc) has failed in its first intent to do well in the market it was trying to compete in. pencil rods are a good thing at high rpm with NA loads.
	DIYEFI.org - TRUE DIY engine management Mazda FE3/FE-DOHC Master Index Thread (work in progress) Mazda truck with FE-DOHC/FE3 "BIG like your house" Holset Turbo drinking 2.2 litres of fuel per minute ~= 385hp crank RIP SleepCounter :-( we will miss you! - RIP fredio54 :-( will we miss you?

11-12-07, 11:28	#13 (permalink)
lundgren420 Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: OZARK, MO, USA Age: 25 iTrader: (8)	Sorry, let me resate. i have just seen a lot of snaped honda rods in the past and figured it was a solution to fuel eficency but "kids" with rice on the brain dont think to build an engine for performance instead of using one that just revs to 8500. So i have a problem with the HONDA "kids" not the company its self. Thanks for putting me in my place Fred.
	1988 MX6 N/A M/T -getting a new heart. Check it out http://www.mx6.com/forums/showthread...ferrerid=35300 1989 Probe GT M/T -my new toy 1980 Monte Carlo W/305 H.O.-my first ride and iv'e still got her

11-12-07, 11:45	#14 (permalink)
fredio54 Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Auckland, New Zealand iTrader: (1)	sorry man :-) i have a strong dislike with a lot of honda kids too, and we dont even have that many in nz. there is a definite arrogance from certain car groups with regards their cars being way better than all others. i dont like it from any of them. i like nissans, hondas (well, their engines, and the s2k anyway) toyotas, mazdas, and aircooled vws. i'd be partial to other stuff too if it wasnt for various things that make them unaccepatble to me, like excessive cost to performance ratio etc. you could say that mazda kids dont think too much about their engines often either. you couldnt count on your fingers and toes the f2ts that have been killed on this site with the "turn up the boost bro, it'll be sweet" mentality. rods didnt fail, but headgaskets and pistons frequently did. anyway, sorry for being a bit blunt with it. glad you took it well! fred.
	DIYEFI.org - TRUE DIY engine management Mazda FE3/FE-DOHC Master Index Thread (work in progress) Mazda truck with FE-DOHC/FE3 "BIG like your house" Holset Turbo drinking 2.2 litres of fuel per minute ~= 385hp crank RIP SleepCounter :-( we will miss you! - RIP fredio54 :-( will we miss you?