New 1/4 mi. times.

**478PGT** · 2-9-08, 19:26

So i took the car to the track today, Silver Dollar Raceway in Reynolds, GA.

Car is 1990 Mazda MX-6 GT, only mod is a ZombieSS chip. 215k miles on stock everything else.

ran 4 times went like this:

16.7@88
15.8@87
15.7@87.XX
15.6@90.

DIG IT!

**Turk** · 2-9-08, 19:52

Whoa what is with the 16.7 run? Get out of 1st then fall asleep for a second did ya

.

Nice runs mate, good work

**ademan** · 2-10-08, 3:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by 478PGT

So i took the car to the track today, Silver Dollar Raceway in Reynolds, GA.

Car is 1990 Mazda MX-6 GT, only mod is a ZombieSS chip. 215k miles on stock everything else.

ran 4 times went like this:

16.7@88
15.8@87
15.7@87.XX
15.6@90.

DIG IT!

the problem is ..zombiess chip is not an upgrade, u actually lose power running it with stock boost, in order to benefit from that chip u will need to turn up the boost or put the stock back on.

**Chuck** · 2-10-08, 7:47

Wow, nice times. Your 1G can keep up or even out run a 2G. 15.6 is what I ran with my 2G with intake and exhaust. Turn up the boost next time

**478PGT** · 2-10-08, 11:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by ademan

the problem is ..zombiess chip is not an upgrade, u actually lose power running it with stock boost, in order to benefit from that chip u will need to turn up the boost or put the stock back on.

damn dude i had a feeling about that, not that i felt a difference but when you think about it, the zombiess must be compensating fuel because its expecting more boost, so without turning up the boost your just wasting time running rich.

**Turk** · 2-10-08, 16:44

Get a electronic boost controller (does the zombie chip get rid of boost cut?, MBC's tend to spike) and turbo back exhaust and next time you go there expect a high 14.

1st gen faster then 2nd gen.

**ademan** · 2-10-08, 18:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by 478PGT

damn dude i had a feeling about that, not that i felt a difference but when you think about it, the zombiess must be compensating fuel because its expecting more boost, so without turning up the boost your just wasting time running rich.

yep running excessively advance timing and moreso, its already been dyno proven to loose hp at stock boost, basically the car runs richer than rich, since the stock ecu already runs rich.

**luexiong** · 2-10-08, 18:10

I ran 15.2 twice and 15.3-15.4 consistant when I just had CAI. Now that I'm getting Steelcity6's built motor we'll have to see what I can get.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck

Wow, nice times. Your 1G can keep up or even out run a 2G. 15.6 is what I ran with my 2G with intake and exhaust. Turn up the boost next time

**Justin** · 2-10-08, 19:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turk

1st gen faster then 2nd gen.

I am not going to get into a big who-ha about this but that is not always true.

**Turk** · 2-11-08, 19:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin

I am not going to get into a big who-ha about this but that is not always true.

Obviously. I would say my 2nd gen(and bassicaly every other boosted 2nd gen) is faster then 80-90% of 1st gens on this site. But like when it comes to basic modifications that almost EVERY boy racer does (I/H/E for a NA car, Exhaust, MBC, Chip for turbo car) the 1st gens are quicker.

If you want to go a bit further and add boost for a few k into a 2nd gen, then do the same by adding a larger turbo and standalone for a 1st gen, prob the 2nd would be atiny bit more infront. More or less, they are pretty evenly matched though dollar - power wise. Majority of times, it comes down to the indivudial condition of the engine/car.

**478PGT** · 2-12-08, 16:28

now someone buy it!

**zlyricist** · 2-12-08, 17:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turk

Obviously. I would say my 2nd gen(and bassicaly every other boosted 2nd gen) is faster then 80-90% of 1st gens on this site.

i highly doubt you're making enough power to be faster than 80-90% 1st genners

**Turk** · 2-13-08, 17:10

I didnt say 80-90% of Active 1st genners

. Most owners on this (and on the road as well) site barely get more then an exhaust setup when it comes to go fast bits.

80% average 1st genner = exhaust, chip, more boost.
80% average 2nd genner = exhaust + maybe ZE(whole/or bits).
My car(and everyother boosted v6, nothing special about my car) is alot faster then a slightly higher boosted 1st gen

.

**Justin** · 2-13-08, 17:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turk

I didnt say 80-90% of Active 1st genners

. Most owners on this (and on the road as well) site barely get more then an exhaust setup when it comes to go fast bits.

80% average 1st genner = exhaust, chip, more boost.
80% average 2nd genner = exhaust + maybe ZE(whole/or bits).
My car(and everyother boosted v6, nothing special about my car) is alot faster then a slightly higher boosted 1st gen

.

So what kind of numbers have you laid down?

**Turk** · 2-13-08, 17:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin

So what kind of numbers have you laid down?

Geesh ive mentioned this before. 10mins to work.

Was waiting for someone to say it.

So you are 'attacking' me why? Is it because of the wide sweeping statements I am making that obviously arent true in every mx6, but is perfectly fine in general chit chat. Or would you like me to be a geek and start pulling numbers out my ass before I talk?