![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
A quiet protest
I don't feel like positing in the 1G forum anymore, its become too much like probetalks forums.
It seems to me that poor panther has been overworked, and is resorting to unwarranted force. The 1G guys are no more unruly than the 2G ones, yet I don't see 3 stickys about getting banned. And a public warning thread? Give me a break. --Jon EDIT: Fexid spelen. Last edited by Jon : 6-24-05 at 21:12. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
mx6.com autocracy FTW
|
Im with Jon completely on this. I read the warnings before it was changed, and the reasons were because one of them corrected the others spelling. Seriously, what are we resorting to?
Hey jon, its quiet, not quite ![]() Last edited by lnlogauge : 6-24-05 at 20:41. |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Anyone who gets angry IRL over teh internet needs to spend a little more time outside. Even though some might consider ones moderating skills, nun chuck skills, bo-staff skills as a great job, a vast majority (hypothetically speaking) have flooded anothers email and mentioned words like "gestapo" and "power trip"
|
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Quote:
![]() "its pretty much my favorite animal." |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
![]() |
j0n- as to your other post that someone shouldn't be banned based on their intelligence level? That is completely irrelevant.
Case in point (thanks Kirk)- I work with many surgeons who are BRILLIANT, some might say borderline insane. They may be highly intelligent and highly skilled in their field, they suck at life otherwise and are complete A-Holes to everyone around them. Nobody likes a know-it-all, even if they're right most of the time. Bottom line is a simple fact, rules are rules and are meant to be followed/broken. Right OutOfHand? |
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Quote:
I agree we need to step down the whole gaint warning system thing, I mean it is generally only a small amount of people who fight. Perhaps a banning should be tossed someones way a little easier when warrented (i'm not going to touch the last issue). Personally I'd rather just send someone who gets worked up an automatic email that says "go outside internet whore!", like a button beside the report bad post or whatever. Maybe thats more for my entertainment lol. Being a mod is a tough job, and i repect the people who are willing to give up their free time to do it. |
|
|
Calgary Import Society
|
||
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
KITTED 92 MX6 GT<-CLICK HERE Quote: Originally Posted by SD6 "A crackpipe is what you hit." |
||
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
Banned
|
taking the fifth
Quote:
Users may disagree with the decisions or actions of the moderators and/or administrators. However disagreements and criticism may not be posted within the discussion forums. Quote:
Users may disagree with the decisions or actions of the moderators and/or administrators. However disagreements and criticism may not be posted within the discussion forums. Quote:
Users may disagree with the decisions or actions of the moderators and/or administrators. However disagreements and criticism may not be posted within the discussion forums. Quote:
Users may disagree with the decisions or actions of the moderators and/or administrators. However disagreements and criticism may not be posted within the discussion forums. Quote:
Users may disagree with the decisions or actions of the moderators and/or administrators. However disagreements and criticism may not be posted within the discussion forums. Quote:
Users may disagree with the decisions or actions of the moderators and/or administrators. However disagreements and criticism may not be posted within the discussion forums. Quote:
Users may disagree with the decisions or actions of the moderators and/or administrators. However disagreements and criticism may not be posted within the discussion forums. Quote:
Users may disagree with the decisions or actions of the moderators and/or administrators. However disagreements and criticism may not be posted within the discussion forums. Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Users may disagree with the decisions or actions of the moderators and/or administrators. However disagreements and criticism may not be posted within the discussion forums. Quote:
Quote:
Users may disagree with the decisions or actions of the moderators and/or administrators. However disagreements and criticism may not be posted within the discussion forums. Catch 22, indeed. Quote:
Users may disagree with the decisions or actions of the moderators and/or administrators. However disagreements and criticism may not be posted within the discussion forums. My prediction, this thread does not have 24 more hours left in it. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
2006 Mazdaspeed6 6-spd 274/280 stock.
Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -Isaac Asimov |
||
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Well, the original warning system seemed to work quite well, but I guess that is still MIA since the server change.
I think the biggest issue is that there are only a few people in 1G that cause trouble, yet the moderation staff has cracked down hard on everyone, and it feels like probetalk in there. Thats a scary thought. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Quote:
did it EVER occur to you that the rest of us are SICK AND TIRED of seeing the constant baiting by you, in referring to him as thick when you quote, as well as his inevitable retorts when baited? this whole farkin thread is pathetic.. where's the wahmbulance. Jon - regarding the unruliness of the 2g guys - yes, yes they are. There is at least as much misbehavior in the 2g forums... HOWEVER - this episode wasn't about any single instance.. the one thing the 2g forums does not have that the 1g forum does - is the constant and consistent fued among the same few members. you will not find constant references to another member, baiting him along, in threads he hasnt participated in. you will not find constant intentional mispellings of a member's name, and you will not find the aptitude with which a topic can be brought off topic. the collection of egos is about the same among 1g to 2g membhers, however, having just recently (february) joined the 1g club, and becoming a regular in those forums from that point, i must say - the egos are FAR more beligerent, high handed, and condescending in the 1g arena... The tension was invading other threads at will (for instance the street racing thread.. why was there ANY need, in the very first post, to bring "thick" into it (and as such), even if it were just to say "on this point we ACTUALLY agree" ?) why the hell should someone in the lounge, or wherver, have to be exposed to the tension present between two or more members, because of some stupid little fued they refuse to let go of in another area of the site? that brings down the whole site - and more than one participant in this thread, aside from sleep and sick, are a part of that fued... we can argue semantics (in regards to the verbiage of the rules, the way they are enforced, etc) all we want but more than one of us (i'll include myself here, we've all had our episodes on this site) have become maddeningly intolerable, and regardless of the wealth of knowledge any one person might represent, it gets to the point where i would place most of you on ignore if it were acceptable, as a mod, to do so. some of you have a serious problem simply being decent, and getting the hell over this whole intarweb thing. Last edited by Goatcrapp : 6-27-05 at 20:43. |
|
|
MX6 #1 [x]Turbo [x]Big Brakes [x]Jspec headlights [x]HID [x]K-Sport Coilovers [x]MSefi [x]Liquid/air I/C [x] 44 kit [x]108mph 1320 [x]oem lip decklid spoiler [x]misc [ ...] done?
[x]MX6 #2. SOLD [x]Toyota Paseo. 42MPG. [x]5.9 Jeep. #1's tow vehicle. Still faster than most KL's.//Modifications List |
||
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Kirk and I actually communicated back and forth the whole while everyone was makign a media circus out of nothing. I guess it could/would be expected, afterall, the Michael Jackson case was already yesterday's news.
|
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Banned
|
hopefully constructive
Quote:
But I've seen four or five threads addressing these issues and they seem all to be closed now. Including this thread (Where did SleepCounter's Street Racing = Death thread go?) in this same forum. If a person didn't know better they'd think these types of messages were being discouraged. As fierce said, "Catch 22" Quote:
This was right out of the blue, for me, anyway. Quote:
Or even if it was benign. This place rocks. That's why I invest my time and money here. Quote:
Someone in the mods forum has seemingly propagated some misinformation about my having received "repeated private messages from the mods" when there was, in fact, one message. Three months ago. b) new system seems arbitrary (if someone becomes "maddeningly intolerable" they can get the boot, irrespective on any rules broken or not broken, any warnings given or not given). Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
If so, (a) no, it didn't occur to me, (b) participation in any "fued" was, if anything, sporadic and (c) I agree with Damien far more often than disagree. I tickle his as often as the system allows, always positive.It is evident that some of the mods would much prefer youngbecker-style three-word posts over meaningful dialogue. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I think it behooves me to mention at this time that, contrary to what many have speculated on, panther did *NOT* (to the best of my knowledge) perform the plug-pulling. Quote:
Quote:
Evidently others think otherwise. Quote:
Quote:
When we disagree (and we do, from time to time), the resulting discourse/dialogue (some might call it feuding, but they're missing the point altogether) raises the value of the site -- brings out facts and information that might otherwise not surface. Quote:
Especially panther, who derives no real value from attending here, being (as it were) sixless. This place would be a total waste of time/bedlam without them. That being said, if you would prefer "most of us" on your ignore list, I would wonder at your preference (not to mention your suitability) of remaining a mod. You do have a choice. Quote:
But we're all human, as you've said just know, "We've all had our episodes". But someone, somewhere is making things up in trying to justify my being banned. Note where M(y)x6gr8RiDe justifies my ban here (Where did SleepCounter's Street Racing = Death thread go?) on the basis of "Constantly bickering and blatantly calling out another person even after repeated private messages from mods". I agree that someone who does that "even after repeated private messages from mods" deserves to spend a few days in the cooler. I bet you do, as well. Trouble is, that isn't me. I have only had one private message from one mod (on April Fool's day) this year. I presume that M(y)x6gr8RiDe got his "repeated private messages" info from the mods forum and have no idea who propagated such fluff, but obviously M(y)x6gr8RiDe, for one, has bought into it. Some mod/mods obviously has/have "a serious problem simply being decent" as well. You know who, I don't. Quote:
Quote:
|