OK a while ago when I did a compression test, I got pretty good results which was....
cylinder #1- 140psi
cylinder #2- 140psi's
cylinder #3- 140psi
cylinder #4- 140psi's
They wern't all excatly 140psi's but were pretty close..like some may have been 139psi's ect, so I just went with 140psi's.
My question is...I have seen a few compression results from 1st gen MX-6 GT's and the compression ws usually around 120 but no higher than 130psi's. Now my engine has been rebuilt in 1996 is it possible that they used slightly higher compression pistons when they did the rebuild? because 140 is pretty high. Don't get me wrong I love the fact that my compression is 140psi's and all of my pistons/rings are wearing excatly evenly in every cylinder. But my compression seems high and I was wondering if mabey I should be carful on how much boost I run until I find out if my pistons are stock compression ratio or not.
Could a compression reading as high as 140psi's on the GT mx-6 indacate that the compression is possibly higher than stock?
Methman
cylinder #1- 140psi
cylinder #2- 140psi's
cylinder #3- 140psi
cylinder #4- 140psi's
They wern't all excatly 140psi's but were pretty close..like some may have been 139psi's ect, so I just went with 140psi's.
My question is...I have seen a few compression results from 1st gen MX-6 GT's and the compression ws usually around 120 but no higher than 130psi's. Now my engine has been rebuilt in 1996 is it possible that they used slightly higher compression pistons when they did the rebuild? because 140 is pretty high. Don't get me wrong I love the fact that my compression is 140psi's and all of my pistons/rings are wearing excatly evenly in every cylinder. But my compression seems high and I was wondering if mabey I should be carful on how much boost I run until I find out if my pistons are stock compression ratio or not.
Could a compression reading as high as 140psi's on the GT mx-6 indacate that the compression is possibly higher than stock?
Methman